Prophetic? No more prophetic than Ludwig von Mises, Fredrich Hayek, Henry Hazlitt, Murray Rothbard, and Lew Rockwell, etc.!
What is amazing and awe-inspiring to those who are used to the lies, and schemes, and the continual failure of the predictions of the charlatans who serve the ego-driven interventionists, is merely a sound understanding of true economics. All the Austrian economists knew this was going to happen and many of them knew the likelihood that it would unravel as it has unraveled.
That is not to belittle in any way the greatness of our standard bearer and the greatest statesman probably ever to live, yet on this planet!
Ron Paul knew what was going to happen because he understands cause and effect. And he knows where to look if there are negative effects taking place. Government intervention in the economy is always the cause of negative effects. It is an impossibility that economic intervention could ever have a positive effect.
For more information go to http://www.divineeconomyconsulting.com/.
To earn a Masters Degree in Divine Economy Theory go here.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Ron Paul Is A Statesman Not A Prophet.
Ron Paul is not a prophet but he is a classical liberalism scholar which means that he understands what is happening. He is keenly aware of cause and effect.
His virtues are another strong quality that stir great admiration and maybe some people want to exalt him to a high spiritual station. He is deserving of the heartfelt affection and attraction of those who marvel at his truthfulness, trustworthiness, and humility. He is a rare person; principled, forebearing and accessible.
Probably if you ask Ron Paul he will tell you that he is what a statesman is supposed to be!
Examples of the prophetic vision of Ron Paul afforded him because he is a classical liberalism scholar and a statesman:
His virtues are another strong quality that stir great admiration and maybe some people want to exalt him to a high spiritual station. He is deserving of the heartfelt affection and attraction of those who marvel at his truthfulness, trustworthiness, and humility. He is a rare person; principled, forebearing and accessible.
Probably if you ask Ron Paul he will tell you that he is what a statesman is supposed to be!
Examples of the prophetic vision of Ron Paul afforded him because he is a classical liberalism scholar and a statesman:
- http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ya6JfFK_lYQ
- http://culturalcapitalism.com/2008/07/18/ron-paul-on-glenn-beck-show-talks-fannie-mae/
For more information go to http://www.divineeconomyconsulting.com/ .
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Is Examination of ‘Economic Depression’ Fruitful?
I recently wrote a blog that described an economic depression as something similar to a whirlpool. After I finished the article I realized that I could apply a similar analogy to an economic recession. In contrast to a whirlpool, the economy during a recession could be seen as a ship experiencing rough seas. If the economy reaches the climax of a recession, known as stagflation, then the seas are very rough and the ship (the economy) is in danger of capsizing.
Here is what is significant about these analogies: If the economy does not capsize during the recession there is hope that eventually the rough sea will subside. If intervention continues it will cause another storm to form on the horizon. However if the economy is on the verge of a depression one false move will generate the whirlpool which will sink the economy into unknown depths with very little hope to resist.
If intervention continues once the whirlpool is activated the currents will just intensify. The only hope is for the intervention to stop.
What is the solution? The correct policy is non-intervention. Then the equilibrium forces that allow resources to become freed up will disrupt the vortex throughout its structure, dissipating the energy, lessening the swirl velocity, causing it to break into smaller eddies, and making the economy safe for entrepreneurs to re-enter, to diagnose, and to set their sails and forge a new direction.
What bit of economic wisdom have we gleaned?
A). Intervention causes the economic storms and it can also create a pernicious whirlpool. To avoid economic storms intervention should stop.
B). With regards an economic depression, the only way to stop its destructive forces is to stop intervention.
C. The political cesspool (politicians and their bootlicking economic advisors) has to be drained and rid of its stagnant and disease-infested economic fallacies.
Here is what is significant about these analogies: If the economy does not capsize during the recession there is hope that eventually the rough sea will subside. If intervention continues it will cause another storm to form on the horizon. However if the economy is on the verge of a depression one false move will generate the whirlpool which will sink the economy into unknown depths with very little hope to resist.
If intervention continues once the whirlpool is activated the currents will just intensify. The only hope is for the intervention to stop.
What is the solution? The correct policy is non-intervention. Then the equilibrium forces that allow resources to become freed up will disrupt the vortex throughout its structure, dissipating the energy, lessening the swirl velocity, causing it to break into smaller eddies, and making the economy safe for entrepreneurs to re-enter, to diagnose, and to set their sails and forge a new direction.
What bit of economic wisdom have we gleaned?
A). Intervention causes the economic storms and it can also create a pernicious whirlpool. To avoid economic storms intervention should stop.
B). With regards an economic depression, the only way to stop its destructive forces is to stop intervention.
C. The political cesspool (politicians and their bootlicking economic advisors) has to be drained and rid of its stagnant and disease-infested economic fallacies.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Ron Paul Will Put Our House In Order!
It is only a matter of time before the quackery of all the Presidential candidates and their charlatan economic advisors start to give off the odors that come from a dark, damp, and unspeakably foul pit. This is the direction they would have us go!
In contrast, Ron Paul has brought to light the concepts of classical liberalism and the principles of prosperity that restore the spirit of America envisioned by our Founders.
It is a path of practicality since our economy has been burdened with oppressive interventionism for more than a century. He shatters the lies of Keynesianism that have glorified all consumption spending and exalted government spending to an even higher degree. These falacies are simply and clearly cast aside by educating all of us about the connection between savings and capital and then between capital and prosperity.
As you read his 'Prescription for Prosperity' notice how spending is moderately cut, how taxes are reduced, how the monetary system is made more sound, and how government's role is moved in the direction of a Constitutional government.
In contrast, Ron Paul has brought to light the concepts of classical liberalism and the principles of prosperity that restore the spirit of America envisioned by our Founders.
It is a path of practicality since our economy has been burdened with oppressive interventionism for more than a century. He shatters the lies of Keynesianism that have glorified all consumption spending and exalted government spending to an even higher degree. These falacies are simply and clearly cast aside by educating all of us about the connection between savings and capital and then between capital and prosperity.
As you read his 'Prescription for Prosperity' notice how spending is moderately cut, how taxes are reduced, how the monetary system is made more sound, and how government's role is moved in the direction of a Constitutional government.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
The Consequences of No Ron Paul!
Some of the consequences of not electing Ron Paul are major and some are minor. The major ones are clearly addressed by Dr. Paul in his writings and speeches.
Bankrupcy of America is on the immediate horizon and, other than Ron Paul, there is no one who has the knowledge and courage to face this problem head on. Consequently no Ron Paul means financial ruin for America and there will be no one who can educate the citizens; instead there will be lies and scapegoating and propaganda, and subsequently increased pressures towards serfdom.
Welfare will be touted as what we need if there is no Ron Paul. The dependency on government (that was created by the welfare state) makes a complacent populace which is one of the reasons why it could be possible that there is no Ron Paul. The welfare state is a class society made up of two distinct classes: the dependents and the ego-driven interventionists. The ego-driven interventionists oppose Ron Paul and the ones who are dependent have to choose between righteousness and serfdom. Wake up!
War is the consequence of no Ron Paul. His voice has been ignored just like the Constitution and the counsel of the founding fathers have been ignored. Continuing down that road: loss of life and limb and sanity is the consequence; loss of civil liberties in the form of an expanded military draft and the ignoring of habeas corpus is the consequence; internal strife and chaos and a magnified exposure to revenge-seeking nationals who will come from nations that we have invaded are the consequences; complete loss of respect for America around the world is the consequence; and a crippling dependency on foreign governments in whose debt we are is the consequence of no Ron Paul.
The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer as a consequence of no Ron Paul. Only Ron Paul stands before the people and stands before Congress and stands before the Federal Reserve and exposes the deceit. He is the only one who talks about the inflation tax and how it impoverishes most to enrich a few. Only he calls the counterfeiter a counterfeiter and demands an end to fiat currencies.
A cheapening of health care is the consequence of no Ron Paul as socialized medicine drains all decency out of 'health' and 'care.'
Education at all levels will be subject to even more pervasive propaganda as a consequence of no Ron Paul. Already the government makes sure that 'government' is seen as the solver of problems rather than as the source and cause of problems. Ron Paul is a true educator. He is teaching us that when our government ignores the Constitution it is immoral, it is unjust. It is tyranny.
There are other major consequences of no Ron Paul. And there are many, many minor consequences of no Ron Paul.
You can vote, which means that the consequences of no Ron Paul are fully within your control, fully within your grasp and not out of your reach. Vote for peace. Vote for prosperity. Vote for Constitutional government. Vote for civil liberites. Vote for true education. Vote for health and care. Who said you have only one vote? Make it count!
Bankrupcy of America is on the immediate horizon and, other than Ron Paul, there is no one who has the knowledge and courage to face this problem head on. Consequently no Ron Paul means financial ruin for America and there will be no one who can educate the citizens; instead there will be lies and scapegoating and propaganda, and subsequently increased pressures towards serfdom.
Welfare will be touted as what we need if there is no Ron Paul. The dependency on government (that was created by the welfare state) makes a complacent populace which is one of the reasons why it could be possible that there is no Ron Paul. The welfare state is a class society made up of two distinct classes: the dependents and the ego-driven interventionists. The ego-driven interventionists oppose Ron Paul and the ones who are dependent have to choose between righteousness and serfdom. Wake up!
War is the consequence of no Ron Paul. His voice has been ignored just like the Constitution and the counsel of the founding fathers have been ignored. Continuing down that road: loss of life and limb and sanity is the consequence; loss of civil liberties in the form of an expanded military draft and the ignoring of habeas corpus is the consequence; internal strife and chaos and a magnified exposure to revenge-seeking nationals who will come from nations that we have invaded are the consequences; complete loss of respect for America around the world is the consequence; and a crippling dependency on foreign governments in whose debt we are is the consequence of no Ron Paul.
The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer as a consequence of no Ron Paul. Only Ron Paul stands before the people and stands before Congress and stands before the Federal Reserve and exposes the deceit. He is the only one who talks about the inflation tax and how it impoverishes most to enrich a few. Only he calls the counterfeiter a counterfeiter and demands an end to fiat currencies.
A cheapening of health care is the consequence of no Ron Paul as socialized medicine drains all decency out of 'health' and 'care.'
Education at all levels will be subject to even more pervasive propaganda as a consequence of no Ron Paul. Already the government makes sure that 'government' is seen as the solver of problems rather than as the source and cause of problems. Ron Paul is a true educator. He is teaching us that when our government ignores the Constitution it is immoral, it is unjust. It is tyranny.
There are other major consequences of no Ron Paul. And there are many, many minor consequences of no Ron Paul.
You can vote, which means that the consequences of no Ron Paul are fully within your control, fully within your grasp and not out of your reach. Vote for peace. Vote for prosperity. Vote for Constitutional government. Vote for civil liberites. Vote for true education. Vote for health and care. Who said you have only one vote? Make it count!
Saturday, October 13, 2007
What Does The Nobel Prize Signify?
At first glance the Nobel Prize appears to offer recognition of work that advances science or the human condition. This is validated most of the time when researchers in the physical sciences like physics and chemistry receive the Nobel Prize for groundbreaking discoveries.
But what happens when the Nobel Prize is awarded for contributions to the human sciences such as economics, literature and for peace. The key here is understanding the correct methodology for the social sciences. The committee consisting of five members elected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences still clings to the empirical methodology (which is perfectly appropriate for the physical sciences) when evaluating economics, which sets the stage for evaluating the peace prize and the literature prize. In other words, no prize for peace or for literature could possibly go to anyone who would destroy the economy, or so you would think. But without a proper understanding of the subjective methodology how can scientific advancements in the social sciences be assessed?
Now let's look at the record. Have the winners of the Nobel Prize for economics advanced the science using the subjectivist methodology? No, almost exclusively they have been empiricists. Do these awards signify advancements? The awards simply represent a scientific bias, then given in the name of science. Hence, they signify and reward pseudo-science.
With this bias firmed entrenched it can be no surprise to see pseudo-science work its way into the other awards. This is one explanation of the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore for his political campaign for global warming. If you think Al Gore understands environmental science then explain why his analysis differs from that of S. Fred Singer, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia.
The explanation is simple. Gore is a political animal and he is an ego-driven interventionist. The pseudo-science practiced in the evaluation process by the committee consisting of five members elected by Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (in other words, the use of the empirical methodology in the social sciences) leads to them awarding prizes to those practicing pseudo-sciences (Al Gore and almost all of the winners of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economics Sciences from its beginning in 1969 up to the present).
The point of this blog is to share economic wisdom. Economic wisdom is what enabled me to see the flaws in the selection of economists for these prestigious awards and it brings into question the other works considered worthy of Nobel Prize awards, at least for those in the social sciences.
But what happens when the Nobel Prize is awarded for contributions to the human sciences such as economics, literature and for peace. The key here is understanding the correct methodology for the social sciences. The committee consisting of five members elected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences still clings to the empirical methodology (which is perfectly appropriate for the physical sciences) when evaluating economics, which sets the stage for evaluating the peace prize and the literature prize. In other words, no prize for peace or for literature could possibly go to anyone who would destroy the economy, or so you would think. But without a proper understanding of the subjective methodology how can scientific advancements in the social sciences be assessed?
Now let's look at the record. Have the winners of the Nobel Prize for economics advanced the science using the subjectivist methodology? No, almost exclusively they have been empiricists. Do these awards signify advancements? The awards simply represent a scientific bias, then given in the name of science. Hence, they signify and reward pseudo-science.
With this bias firmed entrenched it can be no surprise to see pseudo-science work its way into the other awards. This is one explanation of the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore for his political campaign for global warming. If you think Al Gore understands environmental science then explain why his analysis differs from that of S. Fred Singer, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia.
The explanation is simple. Gore is a political animal and he is an ego-driven interventionist. The pseudo-science practiced in the evaluation process by the committee consisting of five members elected by Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (in other words, the use of the empirical methodology in the social sciences) leads to them awarding prizes to those practicing pseudo-sciences (Al Gore and almost all of the winners of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economics Sciences from its beginning in 1969 up to the present).
The point of this blog is to share economic wisdom. Economic wisdom is what enabled me to see the flaws in the selection of economists for these prestigious awards and it brings into question the other works considered worthy of Nobel Prize awards, at least for those in the social sciences.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)